https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102032
--- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
Note that as said in PR111560 comment 6, re-association may break CSE, e.g. if
there are also a + b + d and a + c + e with my example. So, re-association for
global optimal CSE, in addition to being diffic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102032
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed, one way of fixing this is to have a "lower" gimple where signed
> integer overflow does not matter and then we can reassociate all we want.
> There i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102032
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note for the RTL level PLUS for SImode has no knowledge of signed vs unsigned,
it is just an add and will always wrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
Last reconfirmed|
