https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:634de54f9c421b7069865d0d7365ad97412f34bd
commit r12-6834-g634de54f9c421b7069865d0d7365ad97412f34bd
Author: Jiufu Guo
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #22 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #21)
> > _12 = Gif_ClipImage_gfi_1.0_1 + -1;
> > during GIMPLE pass: aprefetch
> > bug760.c:3:1: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
> > 0xde2f5a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #20 from David Binderman ---
This code still seems broken:
**Gif_ClipImage_gfi_0;
Gif_ClipImage_gfi_1, Gif_ClipImage_y, Gif_ClipImage_shift;
Gif_ClipImage() {
Gif_ClipImage_y = Gif_ClipImage_gfi_1 - 1;
for (; Gif_ClipImage_y >=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #18 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #17)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #13)
> > The code in comment 8 still seems to fail:
>
> It might make sense to file a new PR for that, I guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #17 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #13)
> The code in comment 8 still seems to fail:
It might make sense to file a new PR for that, I guess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #16 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Thanks David, Richard,
~/gcc/install/gcc-mainline-base-debug/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/home/guojiufu/gcc/install/gcc-mainline-base-debug/bin/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #15 from David Binderman ---
Since this bug depends on the setting of -march,
I tried out all the possible legal settings of that value.
alderlake
amdfam10
during GIMPLE pass: aprefetch
athlon-fx
during GIMPLE pass: aprefetch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #13 from David Binderman ---
The code in comment 8 still seems to fail:
$ /home/dcb/gcc/results/bin/gcc -c -O3 -w -march=bdver2 bug760.c
bug760.c: In function ‘Gif_ClipImage’:
bug760.c:3:1: error: type mismatch in binary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jiu Fu Guo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3087d1b0a2cbe8880ccbbb67744726ff4e5d390e
commit r12-3791-g3087d1b0a2cbe8880ccbbb67744726ff4e5d390e
Author: Jiufu Guo
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 102172 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #10 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Drafted a patch:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
index 7af92d1c893..5c77c8b7d51 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
@@ -1482,7 +1482,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman ---
This second source code generates a similar but different error message:
void dnslabel_vector_dnslabel_to_dnsname_namestack(int bottom) {
char **name;
int top;
while (bottom <= top) {
char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #7 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
If step is +-1, or if the 'iv base' is constant, the 'bound' would be
calculated as const.
Otherwise, the 'bound' maybe something like: "(max - base) / step * step +
base". For this case, then runtime cost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #6 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Drafting patch to calculate three items: control, bound and cmp.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
index 7af92d1c893..c6e4b24fd83 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
Jiu Fu Guo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r12-3136-g3673dcf6d6baeb67.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102087
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|[12 Regression]
24 matches
Mail list logo
