https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1af8528d34418bc874ae9d993ee0dc3559972d2
commit r12-6844-gf1af8528d34418bc874ae9d993ee0dc3559972d2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 102636 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
--- Comment #9 from Zhendong Su ---
Perhaps the following is due to the same root cause?
[558] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
[559] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
Aborted
[560] % cat small.c
int a;
int main() {
unsigned b = 0;
for (a = 2; a <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
--- Comment #8 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Any further progress on this?
Thanks, Jabkub!
There is a patch that may cover more cases (PR102636/PR100740.. and other cases
where 'vi0.step - iv1.step > 0'),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Any further progress on this?
