https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d1336d977cf0cab75679d4b4170e7c9a86cd1f4
commit r13-583-g9d1336d977cf0cab75679d4b4170e7c9a86cd1f4
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue Dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5)
> Created attachment 52004 [details]
> Testes patch, wait for gcc13.
Add error in the patch to see if there's any change in gcc which can be
optimized, it turns out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 52004
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52004=edit
Testes patch, wait for gcc13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
bit clear and induction variable could be simplified to `& CONSTANT`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Should it be done in vectorizer or ldist(just like memory op), or somewhere
else?
