[Bug tree-optimization/104200] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/atomic-inst-cas.c (test for excess errors) fails

2022-02-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104200 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Maybe waccess should do a similar thing to uninitialized warnings does now: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-February/589983.html

[Bug tree-optimization/104200] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/atomic-inst-cas.c (test for excess errors) fails

2022-01-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104200 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/104200] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/atomic-inst-cas.c (test for excess errors) fails

2022-01-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104200 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|pinskia at gcc d

[Bug tree-optimization/104200] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/atomic-inst-cas.c (test for excess errors) fails

2022-01-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104200 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|testsuite |tree-optimization --- Comment #2 from A