https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.3|12.4
--- Comment #12 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
--- Comment #11 from Kees Cook ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> I sofar refrained from doing this because of the large amount of fallout and
> followup changes and I think those are not warranted on the GCC 12 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Kees Cook from comment #9)
> Does anyone have some time to do this backport for GCC 12?
I sofar refrained from doing this because of the large amount of fallout and
followup changes and I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
Kees Cook changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.2|12.3
--- Comment #8 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
Bug 105679 depends on bug 106495, which changed state.
Bug 106495 Summary: [13 Regression] Build fails
gcc/tree-ssa-threadbackward.cc:22: gcc/vec.h:890:19: error: array subscript
4294967294 is above array bounds of 'basic_block_def* [1]'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
--- Comment #6 from Kees Cook ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Should be fixed on trunk. Can you check on the original unreduced testcase?
Thanks! I've done test builds and can confirm these two false positives have
been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Summary|[12/13
