[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-20 Thread hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #17 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > Fixed (Honza, hope you don't mind the backports I've done, did that so that it > is on time for 10.4). Thanks. I don't mind: I was planning to do them this week anyway and also extra

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-20 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62148f13c6427edd256072b3196a01b3d5ed2805 commit r10-10856-g62148f13c6427edd256072b3196a01b3d5ed2805 Author: Jan Hubicka

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-20 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49aa637488053223bc04e59aac411d4a92ebcf7b commit r11-10080-g49aa637488053223bc04e59aac411d4a92ebcf7b Author: Jan Hubicka

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf4ba940673b80961c5979078f9d37a7bef2f5ff commit r12-8493-gbf4ba940673b80961c5979078f9d37a7bef2f5ff Author: Jan Hubicka

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Thanks, I have verified that on the #c0 testcase on 10 branch it makes both __builtin_unreachable calls go away.

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f6c317b3a16350698f3c9e0accb43a9b4acb4ae commit r13-1089-g8f6c317b3a16350698f3c9e0accb43a9b4acb4ae Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Tue

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-10 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- I am testing diff --git a/gcc/ipa-prop.cc b/gcc/ipa-prop.cc index afd9222b5a2..c037668e7d8 100644 --- a/gcc/ipa-prop.cc +++ b/gcc/ipa-prop.cc @@ -1112,6 +1112,10 @@ ipa_load_from_parm_agg (struct

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-10 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Indeed volatile checks seems to be missing across ipa-prop code. Here is smaller testcase: __attribute__((noinline)) static int test2(int a) { if (__builtin_constant_p (a))

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-09 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- After inlning I see: IPA function summary for rcu_tasks_trace_pertask/5350 inlinable global time: 13.535950 self size: 11

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-04 Thread hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #7 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz --- > Honza, any estimate how long this could take? I'd prefer to wait with 10.4 > for > it if it isn't going to take too long. I am at a conference this week with talk at Wednesday. I will

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-06-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Honza, any estimate how long this could take? I'd prefer to wait with 10.4 for it if it isn't going to take too long.

[Bug tree-optimization/105739] [10 Regression] Miscompilation of Linux kernel update.c

2022-05-27 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105739 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4 --- Comment #5 from Richard