[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2024-05-02 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-09-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-09-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > Yep, it exits here: > > #0 __GI_exit (status=1) at exit.c:142 > #1 0x002b0961 in povray_exit (i=1) at >

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-09-26 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > > > > > > so I'd call that a testsuite issue. > > > > > > > Yep, how should I fix the verifier? Just skip it if

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-09-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > > > > so I'd call that a testsuite issue. > > > > Yep, how should I fix the verifier? Just skip it if the expected value is > infinite? No, don't build it

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-09-26 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > > so I'd call that a testsuite issue. > Yep, how should I fix the verifier? Just skip it if the expected value is infinite?

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-09-26 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-09-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- You need -fno-finite-math-only now.

[Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106

2022-09-23 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Btw. since the same revision fails TSVC's s1281 w/ -march=znver2 -Ofast. Maybe it will be smaller reproducer.