https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4c5b1160776382772fc0a33130dfaf621699fdbf
commit r13-3486-g4c5b1160776382772fc0a33130dfaf621699fdbf
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> final value replacement:
> b_lsm.8_26 = PHI
> with expr: 1
> final stmt:
> b_lsm.8_26 = 1;
>
> where
>
> (get_scalar_evolution
> (scalar =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, and interestingly this fix causes PR66375 to regress again:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr66375.c -O2 execution test
...
OK, so that's because my suggested fix is exactly an (incomplete) reversal
of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
[local count: 1073741824]:
# b_lsm.8_15 = PHI <0(2), _3(3)>
# b_lsm_flag.9_17 = PHI <0(2), 1(3)>
if (b_lsm.8_15 <= 0)
goto ; [89.00%]
else
goto ; [11.00%]
[local count: 955630225]:
_1 = (unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107176
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12/13 Regression]
