[Bug tree-optimization/107808] gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c etc.FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107808 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Hi Rainer, > > I suspect this means SPARC should be added to the list of targets that fail >

[Bug tree-optimization/107808] gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c etc.FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107808 --- Comment #2 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Rainer, I suspect this means SPARC should be added to the list of targets that fail check_effective_target_vect_long_long. From the dump it looks like the target doesn't support a long long

[Bug tree-optimization/107808] gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c etc.FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107808 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug tree-optimization/107808] gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c etc.FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107808 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 53943 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53943=edit 32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-bitfield-write-2.c.172t.vect