https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> So the testcase gcc.dg/pr109410.c passes but if you add -g, the ICE will
> show up still.
>
> This also means there will be some compare-debug failure too as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compare-debug-failure
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Bisect gives a nonsensical result of r13-7156-g31eb8f18bbe646 with initial good
as r13-7155-g51856718a82ce60f067910d9037ca255645b37eb and bad as
releases/gcc-13.
I've checked out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
--- Comment #11 from Sam James ---
Broken for 13 again too:
$ gcc -c -g -O1 ./gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109410.c
./gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109410.c: In function ‘foo’:
./gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr109410.c:14:1: error: returns_twice call is not first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e55b8e091a7263364cb08fd2c9172babb554ab1
commit r12-9428-g0e55b8e091a7263364cb08fd2c9172babb554ab1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51856718a82ce60f067910d9037ca255645b37eb
commit r13-7155-g51856718a82ce60f067910d9037ca255645b37eb
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> PR108783?
Test case was from it. I don't mind not adding such things to See Also though,
I'm still new to bug wrangling. Sorry if it's wrong!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
PR108783?
Anyway, will have a look now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The broken IR has been there since at least 4.9.0:
:
_1 = x_4(D) > 41;
baz (x_4(D), y_5(D));
goto ;
:
ABNORMAL_DISPATCHER (0);
:
_8 = y_5(D) != 0;
_9 = x_4(D) == 42;
_11 = x_4(D) > 42;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Target
15 matches
Mail list logo
