https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> Please file this separately, since it is a different issue.
PR110155.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7)
> Similar conversion, not performed by gcc:
>
> --cut here--
> #include
>
> _Bool foo (void);
>
> int bar (int r)
> {
> if (foo ())
> r++;
>
> return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Similar conversion, not performed by gcc:
--cut here--
#include
_Bool foo (void);
int bar (int r)
{
if (foo ())
r++;
return r;
}
--cut here--
gcc -O2:
movl%edi, %ebx
call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> there? There's zero_one_valued_p we could use for both the
> tested value and the value or-ed into.
>
> We already have
>
> /* ((x & 0x1) == 0) ? y : z y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110087
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Ever
