[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a6aa1927597d821a85bc3d1fd7682256c25b548 commit r14-6805-g0a6aa1927597d821a85bc3d1fd7682256c25b548 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 56920 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56920=edit gcc14-pr112941-thunk.patch Untested patch for the #c6 ICE.

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d1bdbf64c2ed5be70fbff687b2927e328297b81 commit r14-6777-g3d1bdbf64c2ed5be70fbff687b2927e328297b81 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 113015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be9e8de628471399ee5abb1e6ba7738139256b67 commit r14-6742-gbe9e8de628471399ee5abb1e6ba7738139256b67 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- And another testcase which ICEs: unsigned _BitInt(495) f1 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; } unsigned _BitInt(495) f2 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x;

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Testcase covering various cases where 2 consecutive casts can't be optimized away. This ICEs in multiple ways as well: void f1 (_BitInt(4096) *p, int r, _BitInt(115) s, _BitInt(128) t, _BitInt(231) u) {

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- And after the PR113024 changes, one needs -O1 -fno-tree-forwprop on: unsigned _BitInt(2049) foo (unsigned _BitInt(6384) x, _BitInt(8) y) { unsigned _BitInt(6384) z = y; return x * z; } _BitInt(2049)

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Simplified: unsigned _BitInt(2049) foo (unsigned _BitInt(6384) x, _BitInt(8) y) { return x * y; } _BitInt(2049) bar (unsigned _BitInt(6384) x, _BitInt(1023) y) { return x * y; }

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Confirmed. > > Slightly more reduced: > ``` > _BitInt (2049) b2049; > unsigned _BitInt (6384) b16384; > > void > foo (signed char t) > { > b2049 = b16384 *

[Bug tree-optimization/112941] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: in handle_operand_addr, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2126 (gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2134) at -O with _BitInt()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112941 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|