https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349
commit r14-7101-g9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349
Author: Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #15 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #13)
> The testcase below segfaults when compiled with master configured with
> release checking. However, it is very likely affected by this bug (it
> fails with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina ---
Yeah I'll test. Richi approved the fix today and I'll commit after a final
regtest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor ---
The testcase below segfaults when compiled with master configured with
release checking. However, it is very likely affected by this bug (it
fails with checking compiler like testcases for this issue do)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #10)
> > Created attachment 57009 [details]
> > simpler testcase using _BitInt()
> >
> > $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Zdenek Sojka from comment #10)
> Created attachment 57009 [details]
> simpler testcase using _BitInt()
>
> $ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O3 -mavx2 testcase.c
> testcase.c: In function 'foo':
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #10 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 57009
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57009=edit
simpler testcase using _BitInt()
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O3 -mavx2 testcase.c
testcase.c: In function 'foo':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina ---
*** Bug 113145 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina ---
Patch submitted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina ---
Created attachment 56954
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56954=edit
candidate-patch1.patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
Loop seems to have been peeled and versioned, and has very convoluted sequence
of merge blocks for the exits.
I initially thought it would be enough to update the immediate reachable blocks
from the new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
loop has weird shape, peeling should have recalculated all dominators but seems
to have missed one.
Will fix tomorrow when back at work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56943
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56943=edit
reduced.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 56942
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56942=edit
tarfn.i.xz
17 matches
Mail list logo
