https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113707
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42959acb8409c39e1c71c43528832611c3b71e25
commit r14-8800-g42959acb8409c39e1c71c43528832611c3b71e25
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113707
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
It shows two issues. One we do too many LC-SSA preserving avails, the other
that eliminate_avail can result in different answers for the same name
dependent on later avails - that's of course not OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113707
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
Another related test for -O3 (only):
[555] % gcctk -O3 small.c
during GIMPLE pass: cunroll
small.c: In function ‘main’:
small.c:14:5: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
14 | int main() {
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113707
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on valid code at -O1 on |[14 Regression] ICE on
