https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0
commit r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5dacdd14a65ec47bbe310df02a0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhongyunde at huawei dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 84188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Apr 29 08:36:49 2016
New Revision: 235622
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235622=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-04-29 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
For GCC 7 we can now do ptr != decl (for certain kinds of decls). I have
patches extending this to the ptr != ptr case but they need work because PTA
needs to handle points-to NULL (aka nothing) and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 6
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6action=edit
patch
Like this - does it help the particular case?
Note that one issue is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
While looking at some unrelated issue, I noticed the following:
_41 = operator new (28);
...
if (_41 != _S_empty_rep_storage)
which happens with a simple use of std::string (with
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-22 19:09 ---
Richi, this may be easy to fix on the AIB...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-22 20:20 ---
Easy but dangerous ;)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from dann at ics dot uci dot edu 2006-12-12 06:01 ---
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] make fold use alias information to optimize pointer
comparisons
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-10
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
|
15 matches
Mail list logo