[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

2004-12-17 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-17 08:44 --- This would be a good time for new timings. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15678

[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

2004-12-17 Thread belyshev at lubercy dot com
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-12-17 17:57 --- 3.4.4 4.0.0 (*A) 4.0.0 (*B) deltaA deltaB time to compile one empty function, ms: cc1-O0 0.4334 0.5908 0.5836 36% 35% cc1plus-O0

[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

2004-11-26 Thread belyshev at lubercy dot com
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18687 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15678

[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

2004-11-16 Thread belyshev at lubercy dot com
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-16 21:59 --- -O0 3.4.4 4.0.0 diff cc1 18.423.8+29% cc1plus 24.319.5

[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

2004-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-17 00:09 --- At -O3 for the f.c in here, 40% of the time (at least on ppc-darwin) is spent allocating memory or freeing it so reducing the amount of memory used over all will help. --

[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

2004-11-13 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-13 14:36 --- It would be good to get updated timings for this. -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

2004-11-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-13 07:45 --- I think we are not as bad as before now but I could be wrong. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

2004-10-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- Bug 15678 depends on bug 17707, which changed state. Bug 17707 Summary: [4.0 Regression] O(N^2) in cgraph_reset_static_var_maps http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17707 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/15678] [4.0 Regression] Compilation time increased by 10-20%

2004-09-28 Thread belyshev at lubercy dot com
-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||17707 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15678