https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
--- Comment #37 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9695e1c23be5b5c55d572ced152897313ddb96ae
commit r12-3315-g9695e1c23be5b5c55d572ced152897313ddb96ae
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
--- Comment #36 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 22:34
---
Fixed since 4.2.0, wontfix for older branches.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #35 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-15 15:23 ---
If there are not going to be more releases of GCC 4.0 or 4.1, I guess we can
close this, no?
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #34 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-03 06:19
---
*** Bug 31181 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
--- Comment #33 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 09:27
---
A backport bootstraps and regtests ok on the 4.1 branch. Don't know if the
side-effects of this patch makes it appplicable for backporting though.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
--- Comment #31 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 18:47
---
(In reply to comment #29)
(In reply to comment #28)
2006-08-29 Nathan Sidwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jorn Rennecke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR tree-optimization/17506
* tree-ssa.c
--- Comment #32 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 18:58
---
Subject: Bug 17506
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Aug 30 18:57:54 2006
New Revision: 116593
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116593
Log:
Fixed attribution for patch for PR tree-optimization/17506
--- Comment #30 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 03:33
---
I will file tomorrow the bug reports about the cases I mentioned to the patches
list.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-30 22:53
---
Leaving as P2; as stated in the audit trail, this problem has the potential to
seriously confuse people.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 00:02
---
No longer working on this. If someone to take my patch and update it and also
update the testsuite, that is ok with me.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
11:41 ---
The warning disappeared on mainline, see PR22456.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
11:48 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
The warning disappeared on mainline, see PR22456.
Only in the reduced testcase as it was an empty loop.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13
12:05 ---
Only in the reduced testcase as it was an empty loop.
Right. Here's a new testcase that still triggers the bug on mainline:
inline int foo (int i)
{
if (i) return 1;
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17506
19 matches
Mail list logo
