[Bug tree-optimization/18439] vectorizer failed for vector normalization

2018-11-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18439 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-05-22 17:43:30 |2018-11-11 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/18439] vectorizer failed for vector normalization

2014-03-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18439 Bug 18439 depends on bug 19905, which changed state. Bug 19905 Summary: Extra V_MAY_DEF on a static variable whose address is not taken (we should be able to move the load out of the loop) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19905

[Bug tree-optimization/18439] vectorizer failed for vector normalization

2012-07-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18439 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/18439] vectorizer failed for vector normalization

2011-05-22 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18439 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-21 03:49:30 |2011-05-22

[Bug tree-optimization/18439] vectorizer failed for vector normalization

2005-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-11 14:19 --- Really there are two problems which cause the missed vectorizor. One is that we don't scalarize the static variables that well. So that is the bug which really needs to be fixed first and really is not

[Bug tree-optimization/18439] vectorizer failed for vector normalization

2005-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-11 14:47 --- I filed PR 19905 for the missed optimization not really related (but blocking) the tree vectorizor. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18439] vectorizer failed for vector normalization

2004-11-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-12 02:43 --- Confirmed, ICC can do this but does not because it is not very inefficient to do it. -- What|Removed |Added