[Bug tree-optimization/19581] Missed store motion on the tree level

2006-02-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19581

[Bug tree-optimization/19581] Missed store motion on the tree level

2006-02-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 12:32 --- On trunk with --param salias-max-array-elements=6 we now get .L4: addl%edx, %eax addl%eax, %ecx addl%ecx, %ebx addl%ebx, %esi addl%esi, %edi addl

[Bug tree-optimization/19581] Missed store motion on the tree level

2005-07-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 13:29 --- For a reduced array with only 4 elements (I know - this should be a --param) we now get in .vars (with the array aliasing patch): f (n) { int n.39; unsigned int ivtmp.33; int lsm_tmp.32; int lsm_tmp

[Bug tree-optimization/19581] Missed store motion on the tree level

2005-07-26 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 13:18 --- Richard guenther is working on aliasing for arrays, i'll leave this one for him -- What|Removed |Added ---