[Bug tree-optimization/19643] 0 % variable isn't optimized to 0 at tree level

2005-04-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19643

[Bug tree-optimization/19643] 0 % variable isn't optimized to 0 at tree level

2005-01-31 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-01-31 13:42 --- This has been fixed, but the fix isn't complete. See PR 19723. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/19643] 0 % variable isn't optimized to 0 at tree level

2005-01-28 Thread law at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-01-28 16:36 --- Should be fixed with today's change to fold-const.c. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19643

[Bug tree-optimization/19643] 0 % variable isn't optimized to 0 at tree level

2005-01-26 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|0 % variable isn't|0 % variable isn't |optimized to 0 |optimized to 0 at tree level

[Bug tree-optimization/19643] 0 % variable isn't optimized to 0 at tree level

2005-01-26 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-01-26 18:25 --- Exactly the same pattern appears in function.i. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19643

[Bug tree-optimization/19643] 0 % variable isn't optimized to 0 at tree level

2005-01-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-26 18:50 --- Hmm, interesting. Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED