--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-05-02 11:58 ---
The patch given in comment #5 seems to be included in gcc400 and in mainline.
I think this PR should be closed.
Michael Cieslinski
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-03-03 10:44 ---
I applied you patch and did a full bootstrap on x86_64.
No new regressions.
It fixes my problem.
Michael Cieslinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
--- Additional Comments From irar at il dot ibm dot com 2005-03-02 12:45
---
Fixed in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01788.html. Waiting for
review.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |irar at il dot ibm dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-02
11:42 ---
Ira, can you please remember to confirm bugs in Bugzilla when you find them?
Micheal, this bug cannot be fixed in 4.0 since it is not a regression (the
vectorizer is new). I would argue in favor of a new ru
--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-03-02 10:27 ---
After you found the problem, may I ask you to set the status NEW and target
milestone to 4.0.0 ?
That way this bug would show up in the list of open bugs for gcc40.
Michael Cieslinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Additional Comments From irar at il dot ibm dot com 2005-02-24 13:41
---
I found the problem that causes this. I'll send the patch next week.
Ira
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-21
18:49 ---
I think this is related to PR 19716. Note the tree level looks correct to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20122
