--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-17 13:14 ---
Subject: Bug 20256
Author: spop
Date: Thu Aug 17 13:14:26 2006
New Revision: 116223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116223
Log:
PR middle-end/25211
PR middle-end/20256
PR
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20256
--- Comment #11 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 14:26 ---
Subject: Bug 20256
Author: spop
Date: Wed May 17 14:25:59 2006
New Revision: 113862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113862
Log:
PR middle-end/20256
PR middle-end/26435
*
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-18 04:57
---
Fixed on the mainline.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 13:28
---
*** Bug 25449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:17
---
Andrew's code in comment #4 is invalid (don't call no-arg functions with
arguments!), but here's a version that also passes through the c++
frontend and crashes the optimizers:
--
int
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
23:20 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Andrew's code in comment #4 is invalid (don't call no-arg functions with
arguments!), but here's a version that also passes through the c++
frontend and crashes the optimizers:
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29
00:11 ---
Subject: Re: Perfect nest transformation not
conservative enough
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 23:17 +, bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-10
21:18 ---
On the mainline we get a different ICE:
t.c: In function 'do_mid_forward':
t.c:5: internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have
scev_not_known in int_cst_value, at
tree.c:6342
Please
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-10
21:41 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
On the mainline we get a different ICE:
After:
2005-06-10 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* lambda-code.c (replace_uses_equiv_to_x_with_y): Check step
and
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-27
01:17 ---
We now get an ICE:
t.c: In function do_mid_forward:
t.c:5: error: Definition in block 9 does not dominate use in block 3
for SSA_NAME: sum_11 in statement:
sum_23 = PHI sum_11(3);
PHI argument
sum_11
for
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
03:01 ---
This is a problem in testing legality of the perfect nest transform.
We think we can transform the loop into a perfect nest, but can't really (at
least with the code we have now), and do it wrong.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
03:43 ---
Assigning to Daniel as he requestioned it :).
--
What|Removed |Added
13 matches
Mail list logo
