--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-05-03 08:24 ---
Now it works for me too.
Michael Cieslinski
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2005-05-02 16:06
---
I can't reproduce this problem - not for the testcase in comment #3 and not for
the testcase in comment #5 (I tried on i686-pc-linux-gnu and on powerpc-apple-
darwin). Does the problem still occur?
--
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 16:53
---
The SPEC CPU2000 failures reported in 21054, on which the testcase in
comment #5 is based, stopped on 20050423.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20947
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
23:04 ---
*** Bug 21054 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17
23:04 ---
Reduced testcase from 21054 which also happens on PPC:
static int a[27];
void
foo (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i 27; i++)
a[i] = 0;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20947
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-04-14 15:14 ---
// reduced testcase, compile with -O2 -fpeel-loops -ftree-vectorize :
void foo (double *d)
{
unsigned int a, i;
double t[2];
for (i = 0; i 2; i++)
{
for (a = 0; a 2; a++)
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|ICE in |[4.1 Regression] ICE in
--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-04-11 14:33 ---
My gcc is patched with the patch for bug20920
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20947
