--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29
13:37 ---
Closing as fixed as suggested by Wolfgang.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIG
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:23
---
See PR 8...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21218
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-28 23:10
---
Volker, your testcase does not fail anymore. Should we close this PR? I
have other testcases that fail with the same error message and for which
I will open another PR shortly...
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Additional Comments From hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-05-20 17:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE using -ftree-vectorize
>
> --- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-20
> 16:56 ---
> The problem disappeared with Jan Hubicka's patch
> http:/
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-20
16:56 ---
The problem disappeared with Jan Hubicka's patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00805.html
Is the patch a proper fix (i.e. can we close the PR)
or does it only paper over the problem?
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28
16:24 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Another issue here is that this_5 = &b_4->D.2068; is loop invariant and can
> be
> hoist out of the loop. Maybe it will happen with structure-aliasing-branch?
Well really we sh
--- Additional Comments From irar at il dot ibm dot com 2005-04-26 10:04
---
We get the following code for the loop:
this_5 = &b_4->D.2068;
D.2080_9 = this_5->d[i_18];
b_4->D.2068.d[i_18] = D.2080_9;
In analysis of data-ref this_5->d[i_18] we don't check that the initial
conditio
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25
14:43 ---
Confirmed.
Failing since at least 20050421.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
