--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
12:36 ---
This is independent of target/host. My testcase gives a different ICE:
pr21638.c:15: error: Definition in block 1 does not dominate use in block 0
for SSA_NAME: i.0_10 in statement:
D.1281_1 =
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 16:01
---
In reply to comment #3:
No, I don't think your reading of what rules you refer to is sane,
but then perhaps you're not used to building a unified tree for cross
toolchains, re: simtest-howto.html. If you'd done
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
18:09 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
In reply to comment #3:
Usually I just say please attach it because I am too lazy to build an unified
tree instead of saying this
goes against our rules. Anyways I am trying to
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
18:13 ---
Mine, I have a fix.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
18:18 ---
*** Bug 21648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
22:02 ---
Index: tree-ssa-forwprop.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c,v
retrieving revision 2.17
diff -u -p -r2.17
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 03:42
---
The patch in comment #13 works; build completes for cris-elf and testsuite
results seem sane (same new failures as cris-axis-linux-gnu before this
patch). Also tested on mmix-knuth-mmixware, no regressions (no
