[Bug tree-optimization/22254] We never call may_alias_p for PARM_DECL's

2006-03-10 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-10 15:45 --- The two pointers are assigned the same SMT. Is this still a problem? Dereferenced pointers D.1541, UID 1541, int *, symbol memory tag: SMT.5 D.1542, UID 1542, int *, symbol memory tag: SMT.5 Or do you need to

[Bug tree-optimization/22254] We never call may_alias_p for PARM_DECL's

2005-10-01 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #4 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-02 02:05 --- Subject: Bug 22254 I actually came across a case recently where we do call it for PARM_DECL's. I'll try to find it again -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22254

[Bug tree-optimization/22254] We never call may_alias_p for PARM_DECL's

2005-06-30 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30 15:33 --- By These formals i mean g1 and g2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22254

[Bug tree-optimization/22254] We never call may_alias_p for PARM_DECL's

2005-06-30 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-06-30 15:39 --- By These formals i mean g1 and g2 Thanks for the clarification: I clearly remember someone at GCCSummit puzzled by the spelling checker marking formal as error ;) --

[Bug tree-optimization/22254] We never call may_alias_p for PARM_DECL's

2005-06-30 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30 16:41 --- Ack. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever

[Bug tree-optimization/22254] We never call may_alias_p for PARM_DECL's

2005-06-30 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW