[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2007-07-03 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-07-04 05:53 --- (In reply to comment #11) It is up to bugmaster to reopen this PR, as the fix is not effective. This is OK to leave as fixed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23115

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2007-07-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-07-01 13:40 --- (In reply to comment #9) PR tree-optimization/23115 * tree-if-conv.c (find_phi_replacement_condition): Check domninated_by relation. This fix is not enough to solve problems described in Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-11-08 Thread dpatel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from dpatel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 20:21 --- Subject: Bug 23115 Author: dpatel Date: Tue Nov 8 20:21:15 2005 New Revision: 106653 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106653 Log: PR tree-optimization/23115 * tree-if-conv.c

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-11-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 22:13 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-11-07 Thread dpatel at apple dot com
--- Comment #8 from dpatel at apple dot com 2005-11-08 02:22 --- tree if-conversion was expecting perfect dimond, but it is not always true after tree-cleanup-branch work. I've started overnight patch test run. Hopefully, I'll send patch tomorrow for review. --

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-10-30 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:23 --- I'm on the fence as to whether to call this P1 or P2. People have really started to use -ftree-vectorize and it's a major advantage of the more recent compilers over 3.4.x, so I'd really like to see this fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-10-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23115

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-09-30 Thread dpatel at apple dot com
--- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com 2005-09-30 23:52 --- Assign this bug to me. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23115

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-09-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 23:54 --- (In reply to comment #5) Assign this bug to me. Thanks. Done, you also now have the premissions to do that yourself. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-09-09 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09 22:18 --- A regression hunt of mainline on powerpc-linux shows that the test starts failing with a merge from tree-cleanup-branch on 20050409. The test passes, however, with a compiler built after the final patch was

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-09-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:03 --- Before: if (x_16 x_26) goto L3; else goto L14; L14:; # x_4 = PHI x_26(1), x_16(2); L3:; if (x_16 n_17) goto L6; else goto L15; L15:; # n_5 = PHI n_17(3), x_16(4); L6:; After: x_4 = x_16

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

2005-07-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-28 18:51 --- This is caused by tree if conversion. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED