[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations

2021-09-01 Thread gabravier at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24333 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations

2011-06-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24333 --- Comment #7 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-06-22 21:56:27 UTC --- 4.6 still affected: f: movl%edi, %edx movl%edi, %eax sarl$31, %edx idivl %edi ret

[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations

2007-03-19 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #6 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-03-19 09:15 --- `int f( int x ) { return x / x; }' still not optimized on 4.2/4.3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24333

[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations

2006-04-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-08 01:41 --- x/x is done for fp now. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24333

[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations

2005-12-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 18:33 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations?

2005-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-12 15:42 --- (In reply to comment #0) This one, we have to deal with x = 0, what should we do, trap or not to trap. unsigned foo(const unsigned x) { return (x / x); } For the following one: double bar(const double x) {

[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations?

2005-10-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2005-10-12 15:57 --- basing on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'hospital we get: lim (x / x) = lim (x' / x') = lim (1 / 1) = 1 x-0 x-0x-0 should we trap/check anything? --

[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations?

2005-10-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-12 16:04 --- (In reply to comment #2) basing on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'hospital we get: lim (x / x) = lim (x' / x') = lim (1 / 1) = 1 x-0 x-0x-0 for float/float, we should get NANs with