[Bug tree-optimization/26251] [4.2 Regression] code size increase with -Os

2006-07-03 Thread sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-03 14:35 --- Subject: Bug 26251 Author: sayle Date: Mon Jul 3 14:35:13 2006 New Revision: 115150 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115150 Log: PR tree-optimization/26251 *

[Bug tree-optimization/26251] [4.2 Regression] code size increase with -Os

2006-07-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-03 20:51 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/26251] [4.2 Regression] code size increase with -Os

2006-06-04 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 09:32 --- This should have a higher priority than P3 IMHO. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26251

[Bug tree-optimization/26251] [4.2 Regression] code size increase with -Os

2006-06-04 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26251

[Bug tree-optimization/26251] [4.2 Regression] code size increase with -Os

2006-05-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-21 20:23 --- Jeff any thoughts about this bug since it was caused by your patch? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26251

[Bug tree-optimization/26251] [4.2 Regression] code size increase with -Os

2006-02-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 02:16 --- Confirmed, this happens in the last VRP pass. Mainly: Threaded jump 2 -- 3 to 6 -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/26251] [4.2 Regression] code size increase with -Os

2006-02-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 02:19 --- This might be the reason for the slight code size increase with CSiBE: http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/csibe/l-sbs.php?branchid=mainlineflags=-Osrel_flag=--none--dataview=Timelinefinish_button=Finish between the 7th and

[Bug tree-optimization/26251] [4.2 Regression] code size increase with -Os

2006-02-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 02:28 --- The difference in IV selection causes this bug to show up. on Powerpc if I use -fno-ivopts, I can reproduce this jump threading. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26251

[Bug tree-optimization/26251] [4.2 Regression] code size increase with -Os

2006-02-12 Thread dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
--- Comment #4 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2006-02-13 02:34 --- Here's another testcase of what seems to be the same problem. The 4.2 assembly contains 2 calls for TabSet, 4.0 only has 1. (both this and the first example are function from xterm in case anybody