--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 09:54 ---
Subject: Bug 27532
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 29 09:54:11 2006
New Revision: 114193
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=114193
Log:
2006-05-10 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 14:48 ---
Looks more like a typo in tree-object-size.c:plus_expr_object_size
Index: tree-object-size.c
===
*** tree-object-size.c (revision 113669)
---
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 15:10 ---
Just to explain why a[0] + 2B is valid gimple:
a[0] is a gimple invariant and likewise for 2b. Therefor the two sides of
the Plus expression are going to valid for it. Therefor valid gimple.
--
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 19:41 ---
Subject: Bug 27532
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 10 19:41:46 2006
New Revision: 113682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=113682
Log:
2006-05-10 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 19:42 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
