--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 06:14
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-06 06:13
---
Subject: Bug 28937
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Sep 6 06:13:22 2006
New Revision: 116717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116717
Log:
2006-09-05 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-09-05 01:07 ---
Subject: Bug number PR tree-opt/28937
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00121.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 06:13 ---
Ok, I have a more correct patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28937
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 04:40 ---
Actually complete unrolling is not at fault but cleanup cfg.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28937
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 04:12 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Subject: Re: [4.2 regression] ICE in add_virtual_operand, at
> tree-ssa-operands.c:1309
>
> Why does loop change the SMT usage?
it is complete unrolling, we change the statements from a
--- Comment #5 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 04:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 regression] ICE in add_virtual_operand, at
tree-ssa-operands.c:1309
Why does loop change the SMT usage?
In addition, since there are times loop doesn't do anything, you
should simply be returning
Why does loop change the SMT usage?
In addition, since there are times loop doesn't do anything, you
should simply be returning PROP_smt_usage when it does do something,
and nothing otherwise.
On 4 Sep 2006 03:52:04 -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Comme
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 03:52 ---
Note the patch is:
Index: tree-ssa-loop.c
===
--- tree-ssa-loop.c (revision 116671)
+++ tree-ssa-loop.c (working copy)
@@ -405,9 +405,11 @@ stru
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-04 03:47 ---
I have the simple obvious fix for this bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-02 16:49 ---
Reduced testcase (this one fails at -O2 also):
class SHA256
{
unsigned m_digest;
unsigned long long m_count;
unsigned char _buffer[64];
static void Transform (unsigned * data);
void WriteByteBlock (unsigned
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-09-02 16:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=12179)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12179&action=view)
test case
Testcase from application "p7zip".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28937
12 matches
Mail list logo
