[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

--- Comment #17 from mrs at apple dot com 2007-04-13 03:09 --- The followup problem has now been fixed in 4.2. -- mrs at apple dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

--- Comment #16 from mrs at apple dot com 2007-04-05 02:52 --- I think this patch breaks: FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C (internal compiler error) FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p4736b.C (test for excess errors) on powerpc-apple-darwin:

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

--- Comment #14 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 19:22 --- Subject: Bug 29585 Author: dnovillo Date: Sat Mar 31 19:21:46 2007 New Revision: 123386 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123386 Log: 2007-03-31 Diego Novillo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

--- Comment #15 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 19:28 --- Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg02059.html -- dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

--- Comment #13 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-29 19:55 --- I can't reproduce this on mainline anymore. It does fail on the 4.2 branch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29585

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

-- dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|dnovillo at redhat dot com | AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-19 13:07 --- This is similar to PR30840 on the mainline - evaluate_stmt does not care about us possibly going up the lattice (in this case from VARYING to CONSTANT). -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29585

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

--- Comment #11 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-02-05 09:55 --- (In reply to comment #10) The testcase in comment #2 works for me on the 4.2 branch now, but the one in comment #7 fails with t.ii:7: internal compiler error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:434 Yeah, I

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 16:46 --- The testcase in comment #2 works for me on the 4.2 branch now, but the one in comment #7 fails with ./cc1plus -quiet t.ii -O t.ii: In destructor 'virtualunnamed::imagemagick_reader::~imagemagick_reader()':

[Bug tree-optimization/29585] [4.2 Regression] tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in is_old_name, at tree-into-ssa.c:558

--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-28 23:50 --- *** Bug 30316 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added