[Bug tree-optimization/30913] SRA bugs with anon bitfields

2010-04-09 Thread jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-09 10:58 --- It's not reproducible on svn trunk now. -- jiez at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/30913] SRA bugs with anon bitfields

2010-04-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-09 11:03 --- Fixed in 4.3.0. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/30913] SRA bugs with anon bitfields

2007-02-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 23:45 --- The second part of this bug is recorded as PR 22156. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30913

[Bug tree-optimization/30913] SRA bugs with anon bitfields

2007-02-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-21 15:18 --- SRA certainly should not have decided to use element copies at all, that makes many times worse code. That is really unrelated to unanonymous bitfields and is a different bug and has been filled already (I forgot