http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32375
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-16
13:03:10 UTC ---
The issue is that we have
:
# j_2 = PHI <2(4), j_30(10)>
pretmp.38_71 = (integer(kind=8)) j_2;
pretmp.38_72 = stride.2_6 * pretmp.38_71;
pretmp.38_73 = offset.3_8 + pretmp.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32375
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guen
--- Comment #6 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2007-10-30 17:59 ---
Subject: Re: not vectorized: can't determine dependence (array sections)
I would like to keep the two bugs, PR32375 and PR32378, open as we can
vectorize them without having to version the code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 17:36 ---
Subject: Re: not vectorized: can't determine dependence (array sections)
> The testcase gets vectorized even with the failed dependence test.
>
This is okay. The test for non-dependence is added to the run-time
cond
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 17:01 ---
Subject: Re: not vectorized: can't determine dependence (array sections)
On 1 Jul 2007 12:46:31 -, dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (dependence classified: scev_not_known)
>
I still see t
--- Comment #3 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-01 12:46 ---
Looks like a similar problem to PR32378:
(compute_affine_dependence
(stmt_a =
D.1398_74 = (*aa_73(D))[D.1397_72])
(stmt_b =
(*aa_73(D))[D.1393_68] = D.1408_88)
(subscript_dependence_tester
(analyze_overlapping_ite
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 03:13 ---
I think some of this is related to PR 32075.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
