http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32378
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
--- Comment #6 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-19 13:47 ---
> Sebastian - any thughts/plans?
Here's another testcase:
subroutine sub(aa,bb,n,m)
implicit none
integer, intent(in) :: n,m
real, intent(inout) :: aa(n,m)
real, intent(in):: bb(n,m)
integer :: i,j
do
--- Comment #5 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-01 12:43 ---
Dependence analysis now fails with a different message:
(compute_affine_dependence
(stmt_a =
D.1373_43 = (*a_42(D))[D.1372_41])
(stmt_b =
(*a_42(D))[D.1370_44] = D.1375_47)
(subscript_dependence_tester
(analyze_ov
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #4 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2007-06-18 11:08 ---
I see this in the vectorizer dump file (with mainline from a few days ago):
(compute_affine_dependence
(stmt_a =
D.1423_50 = (*a_49(D))[D.1422_48])
(stmt_b =
(*a_49(D))[D.1420_51] = D.1425_54)
Data ref a:
(Data Ref
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 03:15 ---
I think some of this is related to PR 32075. (Looking into IR tells you that).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
