[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2009-02-02 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #60 from pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-02 19:16 --- I tried leslie3d on PPC. The alias-improvements branch does indeed seem to fix the issue. The version of leslie3d built with the alias-improvements branch is about 10% faster than a version built with trunk, and

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2009-01-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #59 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-31 14:35 --- This is btw very likely fixed on the alias-improvements branch. SPEC testing that for PPC would be much appreciated. OTOH I agree with Paolo, so ... FIXED for 4.4, WONTFIX for 4.3. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2009-01-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #57 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:19 --- GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-12-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #56 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-08 15:37 --- Unassigning. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-08-27 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #55 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:02 --- 4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-05-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #48 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 10:28 --- Btw, on x86_64 leslie3d performance is now above that from before r126326. The differences you mention can be seen on x86_64 as well, but they are not related to aliasing or partitioning but due to differences in

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-05-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #49 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 12:16 --- Missing jump-threading causes quite a number of missed FRE opportunities, we have if (i2 = 0) { ... = load X } if (i2 = 0) { ... = load X } where we figure out the redundancy

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-05-02 Thread dnovillo at google dot com
--- Comment #50 from dnovillo at google dot com 2008-05-02 12:32 --- Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown On 05/02/08 08:16, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: and dropping the final dom pass in favor of another FRE one (DOM has weaker memory

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-05-02 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #51 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-05-02 12:55 --- Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown On Fri, 2 May 2008, dnovillo at google dot com wrote: --- Comment #50 from dnovillo at google dot com 2008-05-02 12:32 --- Subject:

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-05-02 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #52 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 14:16 --- Yes, the perfect pass problem is what concerns me too. For example, if we try to do dynamic reordering of passes, or allow users to specify that, we have to worry that, in practice, the compiler will crash or

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-05-02 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #53 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-05-02 15:05 --- Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown On Fri, 2 May 2008, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #52 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 14:16 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-05-01 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #47 from pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-01 19:26 --- Created an attachment (id=15557) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15557action=view) Testcase Found some more cases, which are contributing to the missing 25%. Looks like similar code, but

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-04-30 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #43 from pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 18:49 --- Created an attachment (id=15553) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15553action=view) Testcase I tried a mainline with the latest patch. While we no longer have problems with the prior

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-04-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #44 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 20:29 --- We are putting the HEAP tag for D.914_385 and wav in the same partition: bb 198: # MPT.501_1171 = PHI MPT.501_1167(197), MPT.501_1228(199) # i_25 = PHI 1(197), i_646(199) D.1264_629 = i_25 + -1; # VUSE

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-04-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #45 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 21:43 --- Subject: Bug 32921 Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 30 21:42:24 2008 New Revision: 134838 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134838 Log: 2008-04-30 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-04-30 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #46 from pthaugen at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-30 22:35 --- Just following up with comments posted on irc. The patch does fix the problem I was seeing. Spec ratio improved from 5.18 to 9.07 with the patch (75%), not quite the full 100% improvement I was seeing with

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #41 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-23 14:09 --- Subject: Bug 32921 Author: rguenth Date: Wed Apr 23 14:08:25 2008 New Revision: 134598 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134598 Log: 2008-04-23 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #42 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-23 14:09 --- Likely fixed on the mainline. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32921

[Bug tree-optimization/32921] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Revision 126326 causes 12% slowdown

2008-03-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #40 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-14 16:53 --- Adjusting target milestone (though realistically this will not be fixed for 4.3.x). -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added