--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-05 08:30 ---
Subject: Bug 36318
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 5 08:30:21 2009
New Revision: 148203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=148203
Log:
2009-06-05 Alexander Strange astra...@ithinksw.com
--- Comment #4 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2009-06-05 04:31 ---
This bug must have been weaker than I remembered it; when I used 4 char fields
instead of one char[4], 4.4 behaved properly too.
How about:
Alexander Strange astra...@ithinksw.com
PR tree-optimization/36318
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-30 09:49 ---
Can you provide a testcase suitable for inclusion in the testsuite?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2009-05-30 00:19 ---
Fixed with new SRA:
_foo1:
subl$12, %esp
movl20(%esp), %eax
movl(%eax), %edx
movl16(%esp), %eax
movl%edx, (%eax)
addl$12, %esp
ret
--
--- Comment #1 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2008-05-23 21:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=15678)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15678action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36318
