--- Comment #9 from irar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-08 07:59 ---
Subject: Bug 37194
Author: irar
Date: Thu Jan 8 07:59:40 2009
New Revision: 143183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=143183
Log:
PR tree-optimization/37194
* tree-vect-transform.c
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-08 09:22 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #11 from cnstar9988 at gmail dot com 2009-01-08 09:24 ---
fixed for 4.3.3?
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37194
--- Comment #12 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-01-08 09:25 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
fixed for 4.3.3?
Thanks.
No, still waiting for approval.
--
irar at il dot ibm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-01-05 13:58 ---
To handle unknown alignment of data, the vectorizer creates a prolog loop to
peel a statically unknown number of scalar iterations (0=nVF). This loop is
followed by a vectorized loop (with the remaining, multiple of VF,
--- Comment #7 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2008-12-30 14:57 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
t.i:3: note: Vectorization may not be profitable.
why doesn't the cost model then disallow vectorization here?
This is misleading. It only means that there exists loop bound threshold either
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 21:06 ---
t.i:3: note: Vectorization may not be profitable.
why doesn't the cost model then disallow vectorization here?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-27 05:54 ---
I found this also too and saw it was a regression because -O3 changes.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
