--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 12:25 ---
Subject: Bug 38721
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 9 12:25:00 2009
New Revision: 143200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143200
Log:
2009-01-09 Richard Guenther
Revert
2009-0
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-08 14:59 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-08 12:29 ---
Subject: Bug 38721
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 8 12:29:46 2009
New Revision: 143185
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143185
Log:
2009-01-07 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-07 11:09 ---
Mine anyway.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|una
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 23:29 ---
No, the issue is that A.3 is not in gimple_addressable_vars () and thus is
considered non-aliased. The easiest thing to do is to re-compute addressable
vars after the vectorizer.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 19:42 ---
This information does no longer exist on the branch (and thus it's not
necessary
to update it). But we are probably hitting PR38301 here, so I'll just test
fixing that bug on the branch. Thanks for analyzing the fa
--- Comment #1 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-01-05 13:19 ---
Here is a reduced testcase:
program test_elemental
implicit none
integer, dimension (2, 4) :: a
integer, dimension (2, 4) :: b
integer(kind = 8), dimension(2) :: c
a = reshape ((/2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9/)