[Bug tree-optimization/40140] [4.5 Regression] ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops

2009-11-09 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-09 21:59 --- The second testcase stopped crashing in August or September. Because the first testcase stopped crashing although the bug wasn't really fixed, I thought it would maybe pop up again. But apparently it didn't. So let

[Bug tree-optimization/40140] [4.5 Regression] ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops

2009-11-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-09 13:44 --- Neither testcase crashes for me anymore (x86-64, with and without -m32). -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/40140] [4.5 Regression] ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops

2009-06-06 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-06 22:54 --- The original testcase doesn't crash anymore, but now an even simpler version crashes: double sqrt(double x) { double d; asm("" : "=t"(d)

[Bug tree-optimization/40140] [4.5 Regression] ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops

2009-05-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40140

[Bug tree-optimization/40140] [4.5 Regression] ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops

2009-05-14 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40140

[Bug tree-optimization/40140] [4.5 Regression] ICE with -ftree-parallelize-loops

2009-05-14 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 07:17 --- Created an attachment (id=17862) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17862&action=view) Testcase (about 90 lines) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40140