[Bug tree-optimization/41881] [4.5/4.6 regression] Complete unrolling (inner) versus vectorization of reduction

2012-07-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41881 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.6.4 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/41881] [4.5/4.6 regression] Complete unrolling (inner) versus vectorization of reduction

2012-01-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41881 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/41881] [4.5/4.6 regression] Complete unrolling (inner) versus vectorization of reduction

2010-12-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41881 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/41881] [4.5/4.6 regression] Complete unrolling (inner) versus vectorization of reduction

2010-08-30 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41881

[Bug tree-optimization/41881] [4.5/4.6 regression] Complete unrolling (inner) versus vectorization of reduction

2010-08-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-11 09:28 --- I think that SLP doesn't handle reduction. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/41881] [4.5/4.6 regression] Complete unrolling (inner) versus vectorization of reduction

2010-08-11 Thread irar at il dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #7 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2010-08-11 10:24 --- (In reply to comment #6) I think that SLP doesn't handle reduction. Not all kinds of reduction. We handle #a1 = phi a0, a2 #b1 = phi b0, b2 ... a2 = a1 + x b2 = b1 + y Here we also have: #a1 = phi a0, a9 ... a2 =

[Bug tree-optimization/41881] [4.5/4.6 regression] Complete unrolling (inner) versus vectorization of reduction

2010-08-10 Thread drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-10 16:01 --- Verified on x86_64 using: gcc-4.3 -O3 -o 43.s -S reduc.c -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=1 [two loops vectorized] gcc-4.4 -O3 -o 43.s -S reduc.c -ftree-vectorizer-verbose=1 [one loop vectorized] -- drow at gcc dot gnu