--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-11 19:42 ---
Subject: Bug 42771
Author: spop
Date: Thu Feb 11 19:42:38 2010
New Revision: 156711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156711
Log:
Fix PR42771.
2010-02-10 Sebastian Pop s...@napoca
PR
--- Comment #13 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-11 19:46 ---
Fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 16:47 ---
Subject: Bug 42771
Author: spop
Date: Wed Feb 10 16:47:04 2010
New Revision: 156664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156664
Log:
Fix PR42771.
2010-02-10 Sebastian Pop s...@napoca
PR
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 17:03 ---
Fixed as described in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00436.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42771
--- Comment #10 from amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-10 18:26
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Fixed as described in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00436.html
I don't see how this patch makes simple_iv call from number_of_iterations_exit
return true for j_20.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:26, amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
I don't see how this patch makes simple_iv call from number_of_iterations_exit
return true for j_20. Could you please kindly explain?
We used to analyze the second scop after the code generation of
--- Comment #11 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2010-02-11 00:29 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression][graphite] ICE: in
graphite_loop_normal_form, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c (2)
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:26, amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
I don't
--- Comment #7 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 07:52 ---
Mine.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
