http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47061
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47061
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-29
14:27:34 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 29 14:27:24 2012
New Revision: 189076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=189076
Log:
2012-06-29 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47061
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47061
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-12-24 15:54:35
UTC ---
Created attachment 22851
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22851
another testcase
This testcase seems to be optimised at the RTL level.
$ gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47061
--- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-12-24 19:25:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
For the right shift, the
function is optimised correctly.
Actually, no, it's just the cast what optimises the range, but not the
