[Bug tree-optimization/47239] [4.6 Regression] (int)func 3 is always optimized to 0 on some targets

2011-01-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/47239] [4.6 Regression] (int)func 3 is always optimized to 0 on some targets

2011-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/47239] [4.6 Regression] (int)func 3 is always optimized to 0 on some targets

2011-01-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-11 14:23:23 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 11 14:23:20 2011 New Revision: 168661 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168661 Log: 2011-01-11 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/47239] [4.6 Regression] (int)func 3 is always optimized to 0 on some targets

2011-01-11 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239 --- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-11 23:14:45 UTC --- I've tried 168661 with arm, hppa and sh64 cc1's. The problem has gone away on all these 3 targets. Thanks!