http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-08-02 08:37:28 UTC ---
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, irar at il dot ibm.com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #9 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-08-02 09:21:26 UTC
---
Basic block SLP only prints basic block vectorized using SLP. But I thought
we are talking about loop vectorization here, since the early unrolling is
applied only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-08-02 09:24:19 UTC ---
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, irar at il dot ibm.com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #9 from Ira Rosen irar at il
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com 2011-08-01 14:47:08 UTC
---
I think that this is not really a missed-optimization. It's just that some
loops disappear because of the unrolling.
Ira
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |4.6.2
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-22
12:22:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The problem is you don't see:
induct_v4.f90:1766: note: LOOP VECTORIZED.
induct_v4.f90:2177: note: LOOP VECTORIZED.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-05-16 08:57:46 UTC ---
On Sun, 15 May 2011, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
Summary: [4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-05-16
09:24:28 UTC ---
The patch changes inliner heuristics only.
Yes, but the vectorization of induct.f90 is very sensitive to inlining: see
pr34265. Did you checked the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-05-16 10:41:58 UTC ---
On Mon, 16 May 2011, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
--- Comment #2 from Dominique
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
13 matches
Mail list logo
