[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-05 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 18:00:12 UTC --- Created attachment 29590 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29590 WIP: proposed patch special casing constant phi arguments Ian.

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-04 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-04 09:57:40 UTC --- On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, aldyh at redhat dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #12 from Aldy

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iant

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-01 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-01 Thread aldyh at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com 2013-03-01 19:17:32 UTC --- --- Comment #11 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2013-03-01 14:52:53 UTC --- I suspect we can handle this case by observing that all the

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-01 Thread ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2013-03-01 19:23:00 UTC --- How hard would it be to test whether the values are all constant or have the same SSA_NAME_VAR as the value we are setting? My only concern about

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-03-01 Thread aldyh at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com 2013-03-01 19:33:47 UTC --- On 03/01/13 13:23, ian at airs dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-02-28 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dnovillo

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

2013-02-28 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc