http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-05
11:24:30 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 5 11:24:26 2011
New Revision: 175847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=175847
Log:
2011-07-05 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-04
11:30:17 UTC ---
I'll drop the assert (too many weird asserts in the vectorizer anyway).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |4.6.2
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-24
08:49:15 UTC ---
And with -O3 -fno-tree-copy-prop this started with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166244
Perhaps that patch should have adjusted the assert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-24
09:21:53 UTC ---
nelements is here 16, while vf is just 2 (as the loop also operates on ints).
mis is 2 (one iteration has been peeled already before vectorization).
So,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
