https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51964
Bug 51964 depends on bug 59424, which changed state.
Bug 59424 Summary: Optimization issue on min/max
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59424
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||89018, 59424
--- Comment #5 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||13563
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
Las
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51964
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-23 13:43:33 UTC ---
I have a still rather vague idea that we might value number the uses rather
than the defs: assign the same number to uses which use a value in the same
way. I don't know how t
