http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-20
12:21:19 UTC ---
Even though it makes sense (I think) the patch regresses more benchmarks
than it fixes, and it does not fix the 410.bwaves regression fully. Defering
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-16
12:40:06 UTC ---
Before the patch we choose
Improved to:
cost: 128 (complexity 0)
cand_cost: 19
cand_use_cost: 28 (complexity 0)
candidates: 2, 4, 7
use:0 --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52272
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Yakovlev vbyakovl23 at gmail dot com 2012-02-16
14:42:36 UTC ---
I've checked. The patch fixes the regression. Thanks.
